A company that does a lot of prototype and concept work? Definitely. As a machine shop to change a radius, chamfer or hole size? Hell, yes. Since it's not sketch / fully definable, changes are easy and so are making mistakes.Ĭonclusion: Would I want use it? Yes! But highly dependent on my use case. But the visi implementation I used lacked any adequate PDM with proper controls. Don't know if this is solved in designer. Sometimes, it was faster to remodel the entire part. Especially when it influence other features. Lack of feature tree can make small changes a big task sometime. You want to move a face? Click and drag it.Īnother big advantage from was that visi really handles imported data well. You can use sketches, but you'll most like to use multiple primitives, bodies, and booleans much more. Also, parts with complex geometry are not an issue because you're not limited to a feature tree or sketches. I know with Visi you could model entire assemblies in one file without saving each separate part. The biggest plus is the rapid modeling because they are direct modellers. Since Visi and Designer are being developed by the same team, have pretty much the same philosophy, and the similarities ai experienced during a demo, I think I give some insight. Not designer but used their tool and die specialized Visicad.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |